this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
83 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1039 readers
15 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] starflower@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since taking office at the beginning of 2023, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has been thinking about ways to make the Bundeswehr more attractive as a career.

No amount of money or benefits will ever make me a government's boot licker. Sorry, not sorry

[–] Ooops@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe you personally. But money would actually solve all their problems.

All they provide today is a shitty job with bad pay and no future prospects.

They are not finding enough soldiers because all these soft modern young adults are too selfish for that job, just like companies find no employees because those spoiled brats are too lazy to work. Obviously none of it has to do with not providing reasonable payments of course. So forced labor is the the proposed solution.

[–] ReversalHatchery 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It sounds like you earn too much, or you are projecting. Maybe both. Also, I hope you're better than them and have already joined the military.

[–] YeeHaw 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you didn't get what they are saying...

[–] Ooops@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, sure... I am "projecting" personal experience in the Bundeswehr two decades ago. It was already a shitshow back then with only those with no job prospects anywhere else considering to join (outside some special and very limeted numbers, using their time there to study... but that's not the bulk of soldiers). It went downhill from there ever since.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I believe it is a good idea, not only will it foster a closer feeling of unity and understanding between citizens, it will also be something all citizens have in common, and something you can talk about with anyone.

I am a bit sad that I never got to do it, I did muster, but failed the hearing test, at the time I was relieved, but now, I miss it sort of.

[–] Devi 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Being forced to risk your life for something you don't believe in won't create a feeling of unity.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So you don't believe in fighting against invasion by a foregin power?

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In what reality would Germany ever get invaded and not deserve it?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think they deserve it now?

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're sending weapons to Saudi Arabia and Israel. They put sanctions on Afghanistan that are causing a famine. They're funding Frontex, which kills migrants in the Mediterranean and those who make it get put into concentration camps. And that's just some of it. The German government are war criminals and serial human rights abusers. Anyone who takes up arms to defend these people is complicit.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And don't forget Germany never underwent denazification

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I don't know how accurate this statement is, I do wonder how you would go about doing it now, so far after the war.

Where would you even start?

What criteria would you use to determine the nazi index of every person, what index value would be the threashhold, who would decide on who is nazi and who is nice.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be very easy just take people who use to be in the party and kick them out like they should have at the get-go. Not that it matters because they have very little animus to do so.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do the Nazi party still exist in germany?

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I believe there's a party with a lot of the same values fighting to be allowed onto the ballots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Ok, I agree with ypu on some of the points, and I can see why you disagree with the actions of the military

[–] citizen@normalcity.life 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you don't believe in freedom? Being forced by anyone to give your life for something is slavery.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I absolutely believe in freedom, but I see mandatory military service as a way of supporting the freedom for the rest of the population.

You do your service and hand it off to the next guy, you get skills and training, the country gets huge number of people who know the basics in a real situation.

There are also plenty of tasks in the military that does not require weapons or killing, in a disaster the services are used to support the civilian society, clearing roads, fighting fires, building temporary bridges, distributing water/food/shelter, providing emergency healthcare, setting up communications.

BTW, you use a very narrow definition of slavery.

[–] citizen@normalcity.life 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are also plenty of tasks in the military that does not require weapons or killing

I'm sure someone in the military is tasked with cooking food for the whole army but in order to teach someone to prepare a meal you don't put them through mandatory military service which main goal is to bake soldiers capable of shooting on command.

If you believe in forcing everyone with jail as a penalty to learn how to kill people and to obey superior orders you have a narrow definition of freedom.

Freedom is perpetuated through liberty not through constraints

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mention freedom a lot in comparison to military service, but in no society are you completely free, you have laws to follow and you have taxes to pay, so the freedom argument falls a bit flat when you use it so often.

I see military service similar to a tax bill, since if no one wants to do it, the need doesn't go away, it is still needed, and mandatory military service is s good way to solve it.

[–] citizen@normalcity.life 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have taxes to pay because someone say so and is forcing everyone with force to pay. If you don't pay taxes you get labelled as a criminal and the guards come pick you and escort you to jail, even if the tax you don't want to pay is unjust. If no one wanted to join the military you would have no wars to begin with, russia and israel which are two countries waging war and currently invading another country both have mandatory military service which you get punish if you don't attend.

People can fight for freedom without being forced through a course that aims at taking away their individuality and self-will to turn them into checkers at rulers commands.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you think that individual freedom fighters are as effective as an army with a command structure, then you are just plain wrong, removing individuallity during fighting is a feature not a bug, obviously individual soldier's talents are an asset and should be used by the military as far as practical, but in the end a soldier is a standardized tool that fit a specific criteria, else they would not be as effective.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Devi 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct, I am glad you sre keeping up!

My question was hypothetical.

[–] Devi 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your question was nonsensical

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

I disagree.

[–] MayonnaiseArch 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just dumb. War is good make friends ugh ugh bonk

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically it is true, war has created plenty of friendships that would not have existed otherwise.

However, that is not what I wrote, I wrote that compulsory millitary service is in general a good idea and that one of benefits is unity and understanding between citizens.

[–] MayonnaiseArch 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know, I know, I'm making fun of you

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MayonnaiseArch 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because you are finding a trivial benefit to something bad and pretending that's normal. You can go be a scout, have a sports team, a million other things to have camaraderie. But no, you want the fucking military. In a time when everybody is jerking off to war and finding excuses to enact shit you want the army because friends.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes you are right on all those points, but the topic was mandatory military service, not scouting, joining a sports team or a million other things.

Is it strange that I focus on the topic of conversation and not list irrelevant topics?

[–] MayonnaiseArch 9 points 1 year ago

No, not at all, it's just that you support mandatory military service.

[–] ReversalHatchery 3 points 1 year ago

Neither of the other options are mandatory, and the strange thing is that you support the one that is besides being mandatory it is also deadly, if you're in the system at the wrong time. You think that the possibility of making friends counterweights the high chance of death and life long injuries, and that's just crazy.

If nobody wants to do the job, maybe the solution is to make it more attractive, instead of making it mandatory.

[–] citizen@normalcity.life 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want to bring people together create a program to do such thing. Forcing them into a shooting at people and dropping bombs course is the worst thing you could possibly come up with.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Again, I said it was a good idea, not the be all end all of bringing people together, that is just one benefit of mandatory service.

You guys are really trying to misunderstand me.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] airportline@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Austria still does

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Since taking office at the beginning of 2023, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has been thinking about ways to make the Bundeswehr more attractive as a career.

As journalist and defense and security policy expert Thomas Wiegold told DW: "A major frustration in the Bundeswehr is the bureaucracy.

When Pistorius floated his ideas about conscription in December, he faced a barrage of criticism, including from within his own center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD).

Party co-chair Saskia Esken said it would be impossible to implement mandatory recruitment on an ad hoc basis "because the training units required for this are no longer available."

"The reintroduction of compulsory service would be a serious encroachment on the freedom of young people who want to orient themselves professionally," FDP parliamentary group leader Christian Dürr warned in an interview with the Funke Mediengruppe.

"Who would have thought around two years ago that the Bundestag would decide on setting up a special fund of €100 billion for the Bundeswehr against the backdrop of a Russian war of aggression?"


The original article contains 900 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] citizen@normalcity.life 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Lols@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

forced labour is slavery

maybe folks would sign up to protect their country if they thought it deserved to be protected, or was doing anything for them

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

But they always do it for themselves... ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] Lorindol@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do not see compulsory military service as forced labour, not by a long shot.

In my country when a man turns 18, he has to choose either military service (6 months for rank and file, 9 months for specialists or 12 months for specialist drivers and NCO and officer trainees) or civil service (13 months). Third and very seldomly used option is "total denial", which means you get to spend 6 months in an open jail.

I very reluctantly chose military service, hoping to get the shortest 6 month option. I ended up serving 12 months in the reserve officer training program, so I do have some experience on the matter.

The population of my country is so small that an army based on professional or voluntary troops is not a possibility. Conscription is the only viable choice.

The service was rarely fun, but it was very effective and extremely valuable. The personal growth I experienced during that year was immeasurable and one year of my life is a very small price to pay to this country that my grandparents' generation paid a very heavy toll to protect. A country that offers equal rights, universal healthcare and free education for all citizens, amongst many other tax-paid services.

If you do not see your own country worth serving, I feel sad for you. I would gladly give my life to protect mine.

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I do not see compulsory military service as forced labour, not by a long shot.

performing labour or 6 months of jail does sound completely unforced

A country that offers equal rights, universal healthcare and free education for all citizens, amongst many other tax-paid services.

i am so glad that you have all of that

If you do not see your own country worth serving, I feel sad for you

i said nothing about whether i see my own country as worth serving, but your pity is appreciated

I would gladly give my life to protect mine

and youll continue to have the option to do so regardless of whether your government continues to threaten its citizens into doing so

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you say the same about jury duty?

In my opinion, as long as the system for who is required to participate is fair and equitable, then it's fair to consider it a civil duty.

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

the system for who is required to participate has practically never been fair and equitable, jury duty is not comparable to military service, and forced labour is slavery

civil jury duty is a really weird example to use anyway, since civil jury trials are practically non existent outside the USA

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

practically never

Soooo... sometimes.

Jury duty is also compulsory labour.

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

ok

forced labour is slavery

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›