this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
270 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
57 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kushia@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My operating system.

It's not that I prefer it per se, rather I have better things to do then e.g. spend 2 hours messing with my font rendering to end up with a result half as good as Windows is out of the box.

[โ€“] LeFantome@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Funny. That is why I do not use Windows. It takes so long to set up. First, so many of the drivers are not built in. Then, hardly any of the apps I need are built in. Then, none of the programs stay current without constant admin.

Who has that kind of time?

[โ€“] AnarchoYeasty 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have you not used windows in the last decade? Most drivers you need are built in now. I've not needed to install manual drivers except for Nvidia since win 10 came out. Vs Linux where I definitely have needed to install drivers in order to get my wifi working which is always a load of fun if you didn't make sure to grab it before wiping your primary os

[โ€“] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Most drivers you need are built in now

In practice that means that Windows suddenly decides that it doesn't want to use the AMD drivers I installed any more but its own, while I'm playing, crashing everything.

[โ€“] raptir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It sounds like you haven't used a user friendly Linux distro in the last decade. Mint and Ubuntu will install any proprietary driver you need, but even beyond that most WiFi cards are supported out of the box by the Linux kernel now.

[โ€“] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Also: you now need to remove all the pre-inatalled crap

[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

This isn't unpopular.

When I was working at the Unix shop - we worked making Unix - we all were on windows, securecrt, Mozilla and winamp as coding rigs.

We were 100% using Windows desktops to code a different operating system. I mean, it actually built on Unix and only Unix, because of course, but we were all using vandyke on windows for the ssh client.

[โ€“] argv_minus_one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only time I remember spending any significant amount of time messing with font rendering on a Linux box in the last decade, it was because I was trying to convince it to use the old Macintosh bitmap fonts Chicago and Geneva (not the TrueType versions that B&H made, which in my opinion are ugly). That was an interesting little project.

Other than that, though, font rendering pretty much just works.

[โ€“] Kushia@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Font rendering works OK if you just use your PC for whatever, but for me as a developer I am staring at text all day so I need them as crisp and legible as they can be.

On Windows, out of the box the fonts render perfectly, meaning I can jump between my various editors and tools and just get to work. On Fedora (which I dual boot with currently), even the exact same fonts look like a mess compared to Windows. In particular, the Ubuntu Mono font looks like a completely different (and much nicer) font on Windows than it does on Fedora for me. The same was true for Mint as well which I used previously.

I've probably put several hours of effort messing with my .fonts.conf and Fontconfig settings to attempt to get it even close to as great as on Windows and nothing ever comes close. I'd love anybody to hand me a silver bullet and fix it but not a thing I've read online does.

[โ€“] argv_minus_one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If text legibility is a priority for you, you should consider a 4K+ display. The pixels on a standard display just aren't small enough to render text crisply, even with Windows' font renderer.

As for issues specifically with Ubuntu Mono, I can't help you there as I don't use it. I must say it's odd that it renders better on Windows than Linux, though, since it was presumably designed specifically for Linux.

[โ€“] Kushia@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

That would be nice but the finances don't allow it currently. However, one shouldn't need a 4k monitor to get nice text rendering on Linux when it's perfectly fine on Windows on resolutions smaller than that.