this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
323 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1036 readers
17 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jecxjo@midwest.social 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They knew. They say that because they don't actually want to fulfill their employees needs.

We want to WFH because we dont want a 2hr unpayed commute. The way that ks fixed is for employees to consider the commute part of their 9-5 but that means we are really only doing 10-4 with an hour from lunch.

We want WFH because our lunch breaks don't easily get taken over by meetings because we arent sitting at our desk of the break room. The hour is an actual hour you can't contact me so more "lost time".

With WFH its harder to keep people around after hours as they can quickly mark their chat so to afk. That means no more 4:30 pop ins saying we need to stay late.

Turns out that when your employees can force their work time no one givea away free time. When you end WFH and try to squeeze out more time you're going to piss off a lot of people.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The way that ks fixed is for employees to consider the commute part of their 9-5 but that means we are really only doing 10-4 with an hour from lunch.

Who the fuck works from 9 to 5? Dolly Parton?

[–] jecxjo@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The devs that still work at the place I started at 20 years ago. They actually have a start time of 8 and are expected to stay until 5. Earliest meeting scheduling times are at 8:30 and latest starts at 4:30. Oh and they pay horrible. But its difficult to get fired there.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

But, that's not 9 to 5. That's 8 to 5.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they're just sad it didn't work as expected and it makes them look bad.