Brisbane

12 readers

3 users here now

Home of the bin chicken. Visit our friends:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

deadcat@aussie.zone

gronax_au@aussie.zone

brisbot@aussie.zone

Brisbane City Council Meeting - 8 August 2023 (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/brisbane@aussie.zone

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sort comments by new for them to make sense.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In speaking to the amendment, Cr Wines says that because of Cr Johnston's concerns, his amendment is going to call for another speed limit review after just 2 years instead of their normal minimum of 5 years, and that this is him taking the concerns very seriously.

~~Personally, I actually agree with him on this. There are clearly problems with how the speed limit review process works, but I believe council is required by law to follow it, and their willingness to at least try it again now is not a bad thing.~~

edit: see below. This is not true, and it's really weak from the LNP.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cr Johnston says that actually no, engineers do not have to be consulted to sign off on speed limit reductions, as seen in Boundary Rd, Camp Hill.

While the speed limit review committee will need to consider the new rules and make an official decision, today we have reduced Boundary Rd to 60 km/h.

She quotes from Cr Adams, speaking on a speed limit reduction made for the safety of koalas.

Every year the LNP vote down motions I move to make people safer.

Says a clearly emotional Cr Johnston.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

There is one rule for the LNP in this place and one rule for everybody else.

Cr Wines was clearly not saying the truth when he said "I value human life the highest". Suggests Cr Johnston.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately the potentially beneficial nature of their amendment is vastly overshadowed by some appalling bullying from Crs Wines, Murphy, and even the Chair of Council Cr Toomey, towards Cr Johnston.