City Life

2114 readers

1 users here now

All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 1 year ago by alyaza to c/citylife

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] catcarlson 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Two bad reasons:

If the system doesn't get it's money back, you can use that as justification to cut funding because it's "not profitable". Never mind that most city services aren't...
Police can use "lack of payment" as an excuse to kick poor people out of the system whenever they want. Transit systems tend to allow this under the belief that people who can pay the fare will refuse to ride with people who can't, but anyone that snobbish won't be on transit in the first place.

One less-bad reason:

Systems can use fare payments to get data on routes: how often they're used, at what times of day, etc. Metrics are important to justify your position in the city budget. Of course, there are other ways to do that which aren't as harmful to poor riders.