Asklemmy

1454 readers

77 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Could you resist a true virtual reality and should you? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 year ago by Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Lets assume we develop the capacity to create virtual worlds that are near indistinguishable from the real world. We hook you up into a machine and you now find yourself in what effectively is a paraller reality where you get to be the king of your own universe (if you so desire). Nothing is off limits - everything you've ever dreamt of is possible. You can be the only person there, you can populate it with unconscious AI that appears consciouss or you can have other people visit your world and you can visit theirs aswell as spend time in "public worlds" with millions of other real people.

Would you try it and do you think you'd prefer it over real world? Do you see it as a negative from individual perspective if significant part of the population basically spend their entire lives there?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely plug me in and solder in the connection. Real life is a treadmill of misery.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who's going to pay the service costs to keep you in there uninterrupted?

[–] FunkyMonkey@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, in a world that has technology this advanced, you could maybe make your body do actual work in the real world (controlled by your employer) but you would still experience the virtual world as op has explained.

Sounds like a black mirror outline. I shiver at the idea.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At that point it'd be a lot simpler and more sane to just pump yourself with insanely powerful happy drugs lol. At least you'd be in reality.

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least you’d be in reality

That's the problem were trying to excape from.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If you're on happy drugs, then why still try to escape it?

[–] FunkyMonkey@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

It's a dystopian extension of what it could be if society continued on a bad path. In truth I'd absolutely hope that there would be better options at that point, because society is better. Right now, drugs are simpler and maybe even saner than engaging with reality fully.

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, it's disconcerting to consider, but it actually sounds quite nice to me. Let my body work and be productive while my mind is happy and free. If you're only really experiencing the latter, what does it matter what your body is doing (as long as it remains safe and healthy)? Particularly if you stay in that virtual reality permanently.

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Lets hope I can dialate my perception of time and block out the outside world or its going to be a short life.