this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
178 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10175 readers
25 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] circularfish 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Bad hot take (maybe): I think they have him dead to rights on the documents case but this one is going to be harder to make stick. Mens rea and all that.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] circularfish 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read it just now. They seem to be depending on the argument that because so many of Trump’s own people told him there was no evidence of ‘outcome determinative’ fraud, he had to know he was making false claims fraudulently. Which would work on 99% of the human race.

But this is Trump. That crazy fucker will argue vociferously (or his lawyer will) that he got bad advice from the co-conspirators and he actually believed it … and was reasonable to do so. May well be enough to plant doubt in the minds of enough jurors to hang the jury or get an acquittal.

Or maybe not. Point is, they’ve got him on the documents. This, while more egregious, is going to be an uphill battle, I think. Best not get our hopes up and leave room for a pleasant surprise.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] circularfish 7 points 1 year ago

Good point. Yeah, that's pretty good. I guess I'm just a pessimistic git on this one. Never in the history of the world will I be more happy to be proven wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)