this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
63 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm looking into advanced distros (like arch) and slackware is fascinating. Is it still supported/used? If you'd like to comment an alternative distro, please do.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hibby@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Slackware may not be huge, but it is the base distro for Unraid.

[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Interesting! That's news to me. Does Slackware still use the Sys V style init system or did the devs change it to systemd?

[–] Spacegrass@artemis.camp 8 points 1 year ago

Slackware doesn’t use systemd.

[–] hibby@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've only barely gone beyond the more "backup + Docker appliance" style front end of Unraid, so I'm not sure. They make it extremely difficult for the untrained to get where you can break stuff. I am mostly an Arch/Debian guy.

[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't used Debian in eons but I have respect for it as well. I really like anything and everything open source

[–] hibby@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a guy who prefers community based distros. They don't have business decisions get in the way of the needs of the community. It ain't perfect, but it's worth the tradeoffs for me. Debian for stuff I don't want to constantly mess with. Arch for the express purpose of constantly messing with (and sometimes messing up).

I actually have yet to break my Arch systems.

[–] drwho 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man, I might have to look into using Slackware again for the first time. No matter how much more comfortable I've become with systemd, I still hate it with a passion. If Slackware can handle at least XFCE well, preferably Cinnamon, it's worth diving back into. Been 25 years though.

[–] zzzzzz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Unraid does not use systemd

[–] razieltakato@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never heard about Unraid, but I hear about Slackware all the time.

[–] hibby@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you can manage a Linux server, you likely have no use for Unraid. If you want to put together a Synology type appliance out of PC hardware to run Docker containers and uses ZFS for backups, Unraid is a fairly user friendly option.

[–] Case@unilem.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I run a server on unraid.

Honestly, it works as a way to cut your teeth with a type 1 hypervisor.

Fairly user friendly, and the community seems to offer a lot of support.

That being said, I mainly use it as a file server and a place to host containerized stuff that doesn't need to bog down a gaming rig.

I got the hardware for free, so other than upgading the CPU to 10 cores (used, 50 dollars, not bad) and paying for electricity, it just churns along doing its thing.

[–] hugetechnerd@mastodon.world 1 points 1 year ago

@hibby @razieltakato I have an Ubuntu server with ZFS I’ve been using for a while. Haven’t seen the need for unraid personally.