Technology

37742 readers

73 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

226

Greg Rutkowski Was Removed From Stable Diffusion, But AI Artists Brought Him Back - Decrypt (decrypt.co)

submitted 1 year ago by trashhalo to c/technology

245 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Greg Rutkowski, a digital artist known for his surreal style, opposes AI art but his name and style have been frequently used by AI art generators without his consent. In response, Stable Diffusion removed his work from their dataset in version 2.0. However, the community has now created a tool to emulate Rutkowski's style against his wishes using a LoRA model. While some argue this is unethical, others justify it since Rutkowski's art has already been widely used in Stable Diffusion 1.5. The debate highlights the blurry line between innovation and infringement in the emerging field of AI art.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think people forget the reality when they take their supposedly brave and oh so altruistic stance of "there should be no copyright".

When people already know they won't even have a small chance of getting paid for the art they create, we will run out of artists.

Because most can not afford to learn and practice that craft without getting any form of payment. It will become a very rare hobby of a few decadent rich people who can afford to learn something like illustration in their free time.

[–] Harrison@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 year ago

Art is a part of the human condition. Whether or not it can be commercialised, it will endure as a past-time, just not as a vocation.

[–] CapedStanker 1 points 1 year ago

That is a slippery slope fallacy.

The US is already at world historic levels of wealth inequality, yet we produce such a shit ton of art that our culture is our predominant export.