this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
346 readers
1 users here now
Discuss Games, Hardware and News on PC Gaming **Discord** https://discord.gg/4bxJgkY **Mastodon** https://cupoftea.social **Donate** https://ko-fi.com/cupofteasocial **Wiki** https://www.pcgamingwiki.com
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Fourth one is the biggest offender to me personally. I'm not gonna play one random game out of a series of like 10 games if I can't play the others.
Rift Apart is a very good game that is enjoyable without playing the rest of the series. The story is pretty self contained, even though it's referential.
I've owned every Playstation. I think Rift Apart was the only Ratchet & Clank I actually properly played all the way through and completed.
It's the same reason gears of war 5 did poorly on PC, the game looks cool but I have no idea what is going on.
Honestly, I found Gears 5 worse than 4. Less tight, more bloat and filler, and a totally unnecessary and slow "Open World" section where you slowly sail around a big winter map looking for collectibles and places to go. Killed the flow for me, and I couldn't finish it, even though I was playing it on Game Pass for a fraction of the box price.
The storyline was totally ridiculous as well, total shit. And yes, that's even considering that this is a Gears of War game.
Edit: If you want to know what's going on in Gears of War by the way, the first game (which is remastered I think) is a good place to start for the original trilogy, and the 4th game is the start of the "New" trilogy, which is not yet completed. I'm sure Gears 6 will be out eventually, but for now it's not out yet. If I had to choose between Gears 4 and Gears 1, I would say 1 is the better game.