this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

MTG

34 readers
1 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I posed this question a few days ago as a comment and was encouraged to make it into a standalone post. I'm asking it specifically within the context of Commander, but suggesting your workflows for other formats would probably be helpful for people who aren't me :P

As someone who has been casually playing MTG for several years, I'm only now starting to try to build my own EDH decks from scratch (as opposed to just buying and tweaking precons). I've tried to do my due diligence and research important topics like ramping & mana bases, read articles & posts about determining wincons & threats, and have scoured through EDHREC and Skryfall for thematic/synergistic cards... And all of that is great for finding cards that *could * work in a deck.

But this is the part that most articles & instructional pieces stop at (or glaze over). So now I have a giant pile of theoretical cards for a theoretical deck, and no idea which ones I should actually purchase or playtest with. There is no one-size-fits-all method for paring down your deck, so I'm hoping to hear how you, personally, go about doing it (and whether or not you've come across articles that address this part).

Currently I’m trying to use tags on Moxfield but it’s mostly a confusing mess as I try to trim down ~200 possibilities into a lean, functioning deck. Tags seem a bit too inflexible when I'm trying to tag by both function (ramp, threat, protection) and priority.

Big thanks to Mike, Andrew, gildedjake, and LovesTha BGU who have already chipped in some ideas at this comment. I'll leave it up to them whether or not to repost their comments here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sandra@idiomdrottning.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is a good start. It's easier to build decks up than pare them down.

Then once you've got your initial 99, let go of the 8×8 theory completely. Playtesting is better than that theory. It's just a "get you going" starter.

[–] garden@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oof if building up is better I'm going to have to completely change the way I go about building decks, as my mindset has been to take the EDHREC "average deck" for a commander/style and think of it as, essentially, a precon that I then modify.

~~In the 8x8 theory, what does it mean by "choose 8 different kinds of effects you would like to see played"?~~ Scratch that, I'm assuming they mean the card packs that are in the #8x8 tag on the blog. The first page was all Q&A stuff so I missed that