this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
158 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
16 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

lol almost $2 billion for a website with almost no ads and that makes almost no revenue? Especially now that they closed the (paid) jobs section?

ROI in 10000 years?

[–] Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm unsure of many people know that StackOverflow also had enterprise offerings. Our company has their own StackOverflow instance with very specific content to our tech stacks.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but they stopped offering that years ago.

So, no more job classifieds, no saas, only ads from views... I don't see where it can be profitable like that

[–] Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No they didn't? My company just recently introduced it.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

wasn't it like 7-8 years ago an offer to host a custom community? Like $250 per site (while now i see their enteprise offer is only intranet and is priced per user)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abhibeckert 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Valuation is usually based on potential revenue, not actual revenue. A $2 billion valuation would have been about $50 per user. It seems reasonable Stack Exchange should be able to make that much money per user somehow over the entire future existence of the company... if it's run well. Which doesn't seem to be happening from where I'm sitting.

[–] SavinaRoja 1 points 1 year ago

Valuation is usually based on potential revenue, not actual revenue

How similar this is to how capitalists look at natural "resources". "This website[wetland] sure is great. Lots of people[animals] are loving it. And it's a vital part of the development[water] cycle... But it's just not making me any money!"