A place for the LGBTQ+ community

24 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

Found on Japanese Quora (media.kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by HaleyHalcyon@kbin.social to c/LGBT@kbin.social

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That second one really seemed to miss the point of non-binary and thought they could get around it by just using the gender binary multiple time.

I think the proper solution is to create an abstract gender class and leave it to the user to implement their specific gender.

[–] ombremad@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's very binary all around. I feel so bad for intersex people watching this.

[–] HaleyHalcyon@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s not very user-friendly. And impractical for >99% of users.

[–] BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Users in this case would be other devs using the gender library. They should have enough technical knowledge to handle it.

You could also include common gender implementations in the library. Then we could start getting enterprise^tm^ and include a GenderClassFactory that constructs Gender classes.