this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
379 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
7 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ag_roberston_author 250 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Pay 44 billion for a brand, then change it. Pure genius.

[–] potpie 179 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pay billions for a userbase, then drive away the ones that aren't Nazis or bots.

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 50 points 1 year ago

An X looks like a swastika if you only add half the seriffs

[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been saying it for a while, but his plan was to run it into the ground all along. Who is he buddy-buddy with in public? The Saudi's and the Russians, who both have an interest in seeing Twitter burn to the ground. He started by laying off people, not paying their bills, and making stupid brand decisions. This has been the plan all along and there's really no other logical explanation. 44 billion is nothing to the Saudis and Russian oligarchs if it takes away a key tool for organized dissent and the spread of western ideals.

[–] somas@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I guess, but I honestly thought he would be better at pretending to make good decisions.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brand and user base. Destroy both

[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@boredtortoise And last, destroy the technology. Mission completed.

[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't give him too much credit. Elon is transparently too terminally online to be destroying Twitter because that's his goal. He didn't even actually mean to buy it until he was forced to.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah, he was just trying to manipulate stocks and a judge made him follow through.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah Musk is malicious but I'll give this one to incompetence

[–] AzzyDev 9 points 1 year ago

Sell the servers on eBay to the homelabbers lmao

[–] matthewmercury@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What are they gonna call tweets now?

[–] astronot 7 points 1 year ago

Exes. Elon has too many of those, too.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Crusades?

Cross words?

Xits?

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Pay 54 billion dollars to utterly destroy a platform which gave normal people the ability to effectively spread information about the wrongdoing of the upper class, and which often promoted that very information.

That's why he did this, he knows it's killing g Twitter and wants it dead.