this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
79 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

64 readers
4 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
79
Could a tax against empty homes help end Australia's housing crisis? (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 1 year ago by TassieTosser@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

My first instinct is "yes" but then I thought about it and I think it's just going to exacerbate the short-stay problem unless combined with other measures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're still playing the same issue - penalisation.

Ok, you have person A. Been living in their house for yonks, now getting taxed because real estate turned into a batshit ponzi scheme outside their window.

Low income for an pensioner? Well now the can has just been kicked on to penalise the next generation if they sell or want to move into the property.

It's going to hurt people it shouldn't, because the ones who aren't paying their dues will just find a way to skae this as well

[–] RustyRaven@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see inheritance as a right, and I definitely don't think the kids having a small amount of tax owing on the house they inherit as "penalisation".

Any tax change will involve some changes in who and how much people pay and needs to be handled carefully, but protecting inheritances should come far below paying for services: things like hospitals, schools and nursing homes. The next gereration will hurt a lot more from proposals like an income tax levy, and that will also hurt those who are not priveleged enough to inherit a house.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah i don't think this is going to be the revenue stream you think it is. We're better served removing fuel excise and other business tax breaks to raise funding