this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2023
137 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1036 readers
33 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“We believe the prerequisite for meaningful diplomacy and real peace is a stronger Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending against any future aggression,” Blinken said in a speech in Finland, which recently became NATO’s newest member and shares a long border with Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

*as long as is necessary. russia can withdraw whenever it likes.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not in any way like afghanistan

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right, US is going to pull out after only two years instead of 20.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

pull out of what? we're not in. we have no troops over there like we did in afganistan.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pull out of the proxy war that US engineered and is currently fuelling. This war will be over as soon as US stops pouring billions into it.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

buddy, you don't know what you're talking about.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Buddy, I know exactly what I'm talking about, here you might want to educate yourself https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3063.html

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

you link to a massive report by - ahem - rand - a dubious source of its own, and don't even bother to explain your point or who this adds anything to back it up. more like you google your position and just linked the first thing that confirmed your bias. you've gone from comparing Ukraine to Afghanistan to moving the goalposts to just calling it a proxy war. your argument keeps falling apart and changing.

if you had an argument to make, you would, rather than relying on something you don't understand and can't explain to do it or you.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

RAND represents the views of the neocons who run your country, and it outlines the exact scenario we're seeing unfold in Ukraine as a way for US to weaken Russia. It's absolutely incredible that Americans continue to believe that each time their country gets involved in a new war that this is going to be the one time you're on the right side of history.

I just love how you keep acting smug here while showing utter lack of understanding regarding the subject you're opining on. Maybe instead of telling me what I do or don't understand go read the report your deplorable regime wrote.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You really have your work cut out for you with all these redditlibs incoming

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I sure didn't miss that part of reddit.

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Over" with Putin having gotten what he wants after killing millions of Ukrainians and still occupying their land. So no, fuck Putin and fuck anyone who supports his insane bloody quest for glory.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As Obama clearly explained years ago, there's only one way this war can end:

Obama declares Ukraine to be not a core American interest and that he is reluctant to intervene in the country, because Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there. “The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-NATO country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do.”—President Obama

The only question is how many people are going to die in the process. Fuck anybody who supports continuation of this war. All the west is doing is prolonging the suffering. In the end this will end the same way as every other noble adventure the west was involved in. It's absolutely incredible to see that people are utterly incapable of learning from prior experience.

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

(edit) - Wow it's only been like 24 hours since I've been on Lemmy and I've been in arguments with and been down voted by tankies and fascist supporters.

There were plenty of people back in the day that said the U.S. should stay out of Europe and the Pacific. That we should just let the Nazis and Japan do what they pleased. Those people were either cowards or traitors.

In the end, it's clear one country is the aggressor and must be stopped before they wipe out the other. Your argument boils down to "nah, fuck them Ukranians, let them die because Putin wants it". Nope.

It's Putin's war. He can end it when he likes by getting the fuck out of Ukraine.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I recommend reading this book produced by US military, it makes it pretty clear that allies played a minor role in WW2. USSR was who defeated the nazis:

a few quotes from it

Meanwhile, calling this Putin's war is an incredibly reductionist. The war is a result of tensions that were largely escalated by NATO, and plenty of experts in the west have been warning about this for many years now. Here's what Chomsky has to say on the issue recently:

https://truthout.org/articles/us-approach-to-ukraine-and-russia-has-left-the-domain-of-rational-discourse/

https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-us-military-escalation-against-russia-would-have-no-victors/

50 prominent foreign policy experts (former senators, military officers, diplomats, etc.) sent an open letter to Clinton outlining their opposition to NATO expansion back in 1997:


George Kennan, arguably America's greatest ever foreign policy strategist, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy warned that NATO expansion was a "tragic mistake" that ought to ultimately provoke a "bad reaction from Russia" back in 1998.


Jack F. Matlock Jr., US Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987-1991, warning in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic blunder, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat [...] since the Soviet Union collapsed"


Academics, such as John Mearsheimer, gave talks explaining why NATO actions would ultimately lead to conflict this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4

These and many other voices were marginalized, silenced, and ignored. Yet, now people are trying to rewrite history and pretend that Russia attacked Ukraine out of the blue and completely unprovoked.

What's going to happen in the end is that US is going to stop funding the coup regime in Ukraine just like they stopped propping up their puppet regimes in Vietnam and Afghanistan. This is likely to happen soon because election season is coming up, and Biden isn't going to want to have this debacle hanging over him. At that point the war will be over. It's absolutely stunning to see that grown ass adults can't understand this.

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or, we'll bolster Ukraine's military until they kick the shit out of the pathetic remains of Russia, they'll rise up and kill Putin, and then struggle for the next few decades to get out of the dark ages that Putin sent them back into.

In the end I don't really give a shit what a tankie bot account has to say, so have a day.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see what tune you'll be singing next year when your regime abandons Ukraine.

[–] borari@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If by that you mean Ukraine losing a bunch of people and equipment to accomplish nothing then sure.

[–] borari@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If by that you mean Russia losing a bunch of people fighting for and against Russia then sure. Belgograd referendum when?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, you can wake me up when that happens. Oh and just so everyone can be clear on who your friends are https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/05/27/stvi-m27.html

[–] borari@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] m532@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] borari@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I’m just parroting back the exact same thing people are saying to me, but from the other side. I didn’t start insinuating support for one side or the other in the war in Ukraine made someone a friend of people they don’t know.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] borari@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not a friend of fascists. I actively work against fascists and the far right in my local community.

Also that might be one of the least credible websites I have ever seen in my life. It’s not even a news website, it’s nominally dedicated to the “strange trumpet sounds heralding the Rapture that have been heard in the skies throughout the world”. If you’re going to spout off misinformation at least take the time to stand up a website that looks professional and claims to be some sort of human rights watchdog or something, because that bit of bottled schizophrenia is not it.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You literally just voiced support for literal fascists doing terrorism in Belgorod. And war crimes of Ukraine are well documented, even amnesty international acknowledges them. And of course, these include execution of POWs.

[–] borari@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The military leaders who ordered troops to garrison in illegal areas should be arrested, charged, and tried in an impartial court.

Any Ukrainian soldiers who killed POWs should be arrested, charged, and tried in an impartial court.

War crimes are not ok, and have been committed by both sides. Any perpetrator of a war crime, regardless of allegiance, should be tried and appropriately punished if convicted.

Putin can end this war by pulling back his troops. I do not support the invasion of sovereign nations, just as I don’t support the violation of an individual’s sovereignty over themselves.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The military leaders who ordered troops to garrison in illegal areas should be arrested, charged, and tried in an impartial court.

It's pretty telling that western media has been studiously ignoring war crimes committed by Ukraine. In fact, we never see western war crimes punished, if the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged. Until the west starts holding itself accountable, it has no moral ground to judge others.

Putin can end this war by pulling back his troops

This will obviously not happen, so I don't know why people keep repeating this as if it has any meaning. The reality of the situation is that Russia will fight this war to the end, and all the west is doing is prolonging the war which results in increased death and suffering. The goal of prolonging the war is not to help Ukraine but to weaken Russia. This was the stated goal in the RAND study before the war, and was recently reiterated by none other than US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin.

Finally, Ukraine lost sovereignty when the west ran a coup there in 2014 and installed a far right regime in place of a democratically elected government.

[–] borari@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This will obviously not happen, so I don’t know why people keep repeating this as if it has any meaning.

Why does Ukraine bear all the responsibility in ending a war started by Russia?

Until the west starts holding itself accountable, it has no moral ground to judge others.

That’s rich, coming from someone who lives in the West. To be fair explicitly clear, I don’t agree with the lack of accountability in the west. I don’t agree with Bush’s foreign policy, I don’t agree with the expansion of drone strikes by Obama, I don’t agree with the Iranian assassination ordered by Trump, and I don’t agree with Biden’s use of drone strikes.

You seem to be under the impression that the sins of the US absolve Putin and his troops. It just makes them all terrible. I can see that we’ll never agree to anything here, so I’ll bring some clojure to it on my end at least and just stop responding. I can’t say I’ve enjoyed our conversation, but I’m appreciative of the opportunity to have had it.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Why does Ukraine bear all the responsibility in ending a war started by Russia?

This isn't about bearing responsibility, it's about dealing with the real world. Ukraine is not able to defeat Russia in this war. That's just a simple fact. Whatever the west is doing is not going to change the outcome. You don't have to take my word for it. This is literally what Obama stated back in 2016:

Obama declares Ukraine to be not a core American interest and that he is reluctant to intervene in the country, because Russia will always be able to maintain escalatory dominance there. “**The fact is that Ukraine, which is a non-NATO country, is going to be vulnerable to military domination by Russia no matter what we do.((”

You seem to be under the impression that the sins of the US absolve Putin and his troops.

I've never stated anything of the sort. You seem to equate honestly discussing the causes for the war with moral support.