this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
193 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
47 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adonis@kbin.social 72 points 1 year ago (5 children)

New user: I have a problem 😊

Everyone:👍

  • are you on xorg or wayland?
  • pulseaudio or pipewire?
  • what WM/DE are you using?
  • amd or nvidia?
  • what distro?
  • systemd?

New user: Nevermind 😮‍💨

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if a new user is using a distro that doesn't use systemd they fell for a meme

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if a new user is using a distro that doesn’t use systemd they fell for a meme

Or they hate fridge art like systemd and are on something like PCLinuxOS or Alpine.

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

That's what I mean though, why would a new user be running alpine as a desktop os?

[–] Nuuskis9@feddit.nl 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

At this point, my biggest dream is that these 'new user' distros used only Wayland, Pipewire, Systemd and Flatpaks simply to simplify things. Hopefully we're less than 2024 away from NoVideo Wayland support.

Also as soon as XFCE releases their Wayland support, that soon it'll become the most famous DE choice of Mint.

What I am really happy is to see how well supported Pipewire already is. Pipewire has never showed any problem in the new installs for me.

[–] KindaABigDyl@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with that is most major distros market themselves as "new user" distros to some extent though. Noob-friendly, out-of-the-box, easy, etc are all distro-marketing buzz-words that mean nothing.

You can't expect them to only use Wayland, Pipewire, Systemd, and Flatpaks because that dream requires every distro to use Wayland, Pipewire, Systemd, and Flatpaks, which will never be reality.

Most distros will probably eventually adopt these tools, but there won't be a sudden shift. It will be gradual.

[–] Nuuskis9@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Well, for Pipewire it's the apps which needs to adjust at this point. Only thing missing currently is the Wayland but it's coming. Making Linux less fragmented (read: confusing), the more new users will give a try.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Systemd

Fridge art. Fuck, they MAYBE have nfsroot working. MAYBE. After a decade of fucking around, when it was available for ages. The number of bags on the side of lennart's piece of crap, just to reinvent the wheels we had before, is absolutely ridiculous.

and Flatpaks

... break single source of truth for as-built information and current software manifest. This kills validation, which dissolves certainty on consistency, then repeatability. And given the state of the software load exported to management tools is NOT the flatpak source of truth, you now have a false negative on the 'installation' of a flatpak resource when checking it via management.

Oh. That needs to be on the interview questions.

[–] michaelrose@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

pipewire seems ready for primetime but I'm more dubious about Wayland. For instance KDE appears to still be a bit flaky and sway still works poorly under Nvidia and will never have proper mixed DPI for xwayland apps. Still seems like a tradeoff vs X which doesn't require a compromise. XFCE is roughly 10% of Mint users. Mint users are unlikely to switch because of wayland support

[–] michaelrose@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doing tech support, I encountered this attitude. People like that are nearly impossible to help. "Why can't you just fix it!" The true answer never given is that your problem is probably something stupid you are doing, like trying to make a phone call by physically shoving the phone entirely up your asshole, and until I run through some common problems and ask some questions, I won't be able to tell you to have your significant other get the salad tongs and pull it out of your rear and then go over "dialing."

People mostly need to be willing to gather detailed system info with Inxi and share it.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I'll have you know I get better reception when it's up my ass!

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you want them to provide answers by using magic? If you seek support for any software, open source or otherwise, you'll need to tell them version, build number etc. Why do you think Linux will be any different?

[–] Dhs92@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because people can already barely provide this level of information for a Windows device. Most of these words look like technobabble to non-tech-enthusiasts

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course the words will be different. They aren't hard words. And they can be answered very easily. In fact, most forums ask to include an output of something like inxi -Fazy with every question, thus eliminating the need for all of these things.

For more niche problems, people might ask for more specific information. But most of the time, they'll tell you exactly what to run to get that information.

You know what's the Windows alternative for this? Most of the time, nothing. You need to reinstall Windows. Mac is similar, except you need to have it replaced. You actually CAN repair Linux. That's the difference.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Why don't you magically have a magic button that magically fixes everything with no effort of my own? That's stupid, I think I will go on social media and repeatedly tell everyone that Linux is bad actually