this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1457 readers
133 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The USA is not a true democracy in the academic sense of the word.

[โ€“] yhnavein@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

It's not very democratic in common sense as well.

[โ€“] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

There has never been a true democracy anywhere and anytime in history, even today.

Every democratic government in existence currently today is severely affected or influenced by monied, corporate, aristocratic, hereditary or powerful interests to some degree. Some countries manage it better than others but all of them fall short of a true democracy ... a system that is controlled by the people and benefits everyone equally.

[โ€“] psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its just not a democracy.

IMO the US is de-facto like the ancient Roman republic, where plebeians, could vote but only for patricians, so "everybody" (ofc slaves and womens rights were neglected back then) could vote but all questions that were ever discussed in the senate were interests of patricians, same goes for political "coverage" and campaign elections.

So there was dissent and processes that were democratic on the surface but they exclusively revolved around the interests of the patricians.

The US is like that where patrician interests are replaced with capital interests. You can only vote multi-millionaires into the white house and the only issues to ever change are the issues of a fraction within the capitalist class (meaning someone living off of someone elses labour rather than their own).

If you belong to those capitalists you enjoy democratic representation, if not you can only decide which capitalist position you find better and vote for that.

[โ€“] Weirdbeardgame@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A democratic republic more specifically

[โ€“] HamsterRage@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

That's virtually meaningless. A "republic" is virtually any country that doesn't have a monarchy or dictator.

So drawing a distinction between a "democracy" and a "democratic republic" in this manner is a waste of time. There plenty of democratic monarchies, which are equally democracies, too.