this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1464 readers
54 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] supersane@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[โ€“] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[โ€“] AbelianGrape 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Difference between the colloquial and technical definitions of fluids. Colloquially, fluids are liquids. But technically, for example when discussing physics, it's any substance of no fixed shape.

[โ€“] exi@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was about to argue with you but the dictionary says you are right.

Take my upvote.

[โ€“] Tak@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

In english generally we see liquids to be the same as fluids but technically liquids are a state and fluids are matter that flows. Similarly we will see accuracy and precision as the same thing but accuracy is within a range where precision is exact.

As an example: Strawberries and raspberries aren't even berries but pumpkins are botanically speaking. I would be accurate to regard strawberries and raspberries as berries as we use them as berries but I would not be precise.

[โ€“] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

According to any hydrodynamics code, so are solids.