this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

City Life

2114 readers
1 users here now

All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
15
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by omenmis to c/citylife
 

hoping this catches on, pretty please CA...

i like the fact that the money can only go into maintaining the speed cameras or into making the road safer. those are both things desperately needed, especially in LA.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] offthecrossbar 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Regarding #1, the problem lies in the implementation of the cameras. I think the idea of average speed cameras are interesting. Basically, just have multiple cameras and use the time a driver takes to get from one to the other to calculate their average speed. This way you can't game it by slowing down at specific points.

[–] Pseu 4 points 1 year ago

And it seems to be a theoretical claim that people will slam on the brakes to avoid getting a ticket, causing accidents. But studies show that speed cameras do in fact reduce accident rates:

Twenty eight studies measured the effect on crashes. All 28 studies found a lower number of crashes in the speed camera areas after implementation of the program. In the vicinity of camera sites, the reductions ranged from 8% to 49% for all crashes, with reductions for most studies in the 14% to 25% range. For injury crashes the decrease ranged between 8% to 50% and for crashes resulting in fatalities or serious injuries the reductions were in the range of 11% to 44%. Effects over wider areas showed reductions for all crashes ranging from 9% to 35%, with most studies reporting reductions in the 11% to to 27% range. For crashes resulting in death or serious injury reductions ranged from 17% to 58%, with most studies reporting this result in the 30% to 40% reduction range. The studies of longer duration showed that these positive trends were either maintained or improved with time.

https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004607.pub4/abstract

[–] argv_minus_one 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It doesn't, however, protect innocent people from being fined for accelerating to get away from someone aggressively tailgating them. Punishing innocent people is not acceptable.

[–] soiling 6 points 1 year ago

accelerating because someone is tailgating you is not safe. the only safe response is to get away from them by changing lanes or pulling off the road. if it's impossible to move out of their way, gradually slow down. the faster you're both moving, the harder it is to avoid a crash and the worse a crash will be.

[–] offthecrossbar 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The threshold doesn't need to be the exact speed limit, I'm sure there's some wiggle room. How innocent is the other driver in this case though? Even if there's another car doing it too they are still driving over the speed limit.

[–] argv_minus_one 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's not a solution. Drivers must, above all else, drive safely and not collide with anything. If, for whatever reason, the safest course of action involves exceeding the speed limit (or some other hidden threshold, like you're talking about), then it is both wrong and dangerous to punish them for doing so.

[–] offthecrossbar 5 points 1 year ago

What about all the other pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers who are on that road? Are they safer because now there are two drivers speeding instead of one? The benefits of reducing vehicle speeds on crash fatality and frequency are outlined in the article. It sounds like you're saying that "breaking the speed limit without punishment" is a tool drivers need to have in their toolbox to drive safely, but right now we give them that tool and vehicles speeds are out of control and the traffic death statistics are unacceptable.

https://tripnet.org/reports/traffic-safety-california-news-release-06-21-2023/

load more comments (1 replies)