this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
414 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37720 readers
29 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You don't buy that it's the law?
What you're saying is because Meta is rich, they don't have to obey the law?
Anyone who's rich in America doesn't have to obey the law. That's not a matter of opinion. There's a clear and observable imbalance between the rich and poor in regard to the outcomes experienced in the American justice system.
Yes, that is what is happening. But that's not what I'm asking. I know there's imbalance between the rich and the poor in the justice system. What I'm asking is, is that how it should be?
You've accepted that as an acceptable thing that rich people/companies don't have to obey the law, and that rich people/companies obeying the law is a bad thing? Because what you've said above is that because Meta is rich, so they shouldn't obey the law.
No, you've accepted that rich people/companies don't have to obey the law. (Or, at least, that's the tenor of your commentary.)
Therefore it needed to said that, no, they don't have to obey the law. They're complicit in the corruption that's forcing this young woman to account for an abortion that should already be legal, at least in a just society.