this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37720 readers
29 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The whole article reads like a tesla ad. Uptime percentages for Tesla which can’t be confirmed and nothing except “plagued by downtime” for other chargers. Tesla is doing this because other companies are eating their lunch. Elon literally said he’d never do 400v because no one needs it and now look at him.
And it’s ridiculously backwards. The CCS 2 standard allows for so much more than Tesla’s connector and yet people act like NACS is better. It’s literally called North American Charging Standard for a reason, because no one else uses it.
Yeah, only 400V. :/ a lot of cars will have 800V in the future. Of course, they have technology built in to be compatible to 400V charging. But the automakers using 800V are already speculating the drop the 400V compatibility as soon as possible because it will get less and less relevant. (Despite Tesla, most new installed chargers are 400V chargers… is anyone else installing still 400V???)
And 900A charging through this tiny NACS connector… well. For how long? 2 minutes? I’m still quite sceptical.
We‘ll see what happens.