Technology

37735 readers

45 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

239

Gizmodo and Kotaku Staff Furious After Owner Announces Move to AI Content (futurism.com)

submitted 1 year ago by thejml@lemm.ee to c/technology

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

G/O Media, a major online media company that runs publications including Gizmodo, Kotaku, Quartz, Jezebel, and Deadspin, has announced that it will begin a "modest test" of AI content on its sites.

…

The trial will include "producing just a handful of stories for most of our sites that are basically built around lists and data," Brown wrote. "These features aren't replacing work currently being done by writers and editors, and we hope that over time if we get these forms of content right and produced at scale, AI will, via search and promotion, help us grow our audience."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zapp 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems like the preferred approach is "... And find out", lately.

The lawyers always win, in the end.

[–] kbyanyname 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I get the feeling they're hoping that this will be moving too fast for it to really get caught. It's just so wild that so much effort is put into getting robots to do the creative work (that people would like to underpay for) as opposed to the routine work that AI would actually be good at (but wouldn't save much money)