this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
14 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To be honest I like the idea of being able to move my account from a server which is offline to a different one. We should have it with ActivityPub too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rimlogger 11 points 1 year ago (14 children)

FYI, as great as Mastodon and the fediverse are, there are issues that prevent their mainstream adoption:

https://blog.bloonface.com/2023/06/12/why-did-the-twittermigration-fail/

[–] Thalestr 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was able to move from Reddit to Lemmy with minimal learning curve but I tried Mastodon about a year ago and it felt impenetrable and confusing. The author is absolutely right that people don't see decentralization as a selling point. Anecdotally, the people I have talked to about federated alternatives have nothing positive to say about their experiences except the small handful of people that use things like Lemmy or Kbin.

[–] rambaroo 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My girlfriend noped out of lemmy pretty much immediately after I tried to explain how to set it up and use it. Objectively, it's a lot more confusing than signing up for something like reddit. She's also pretty tech savvy, so I can't imagine normies making the transition in mass.

If these federated alternatives are going to become mainstream, someone will have to step up with an implementation that greatly improves usability and accessibility. Meaning that federation will probably have to be masked to a large degree to reduce confusion. Maybe something more like a distributed network instead of a federated one.

As soon as you start talking techbro nonsense like federation and decentralization, people's eyes glaze over. People don't care how things work, they just care that it does what they need it to.

Hate to say it but a lot of us in tech, especially the devs, are really out of touch with end users. They aren't philosophizing about the internet. I understand why people are excited about the idea of decentralization, and why it matters, but it has to be presented in a way that's much simpler for people to understand if we actually went people to get on board.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah, I don't buy it, people have been telling me that they don't understand Twitter, what it is for and so on for years and most of my normal friends never got a Twitter account, while most of them had a Facebook account. It's not about federated vs. non federated, they all have a federated email account from their school, university, work, etc. and everyone has a username@domain.tld address and nobody is complaining about that it's not just @username for email. It's more that it's not useful for them to have a Twitter account or a Mastodon account or a Lemmy account. If it were useful they would just deal with the complexity like they do with the complexity of Facebook and Email.

[–] Thugosaurus_Rex 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think decentralized social media isn't really analogous to your email example and is going to be much more confusing and frustrating to an average user. I may sign up with Gmail, but I can still in almost any use case send or recieve an email to whoever I want at other domains. The fact that someone is @X or @Y doesn't matter to most users--it's just an extension of the address.

Decentralized Social Media I think would be viewed more like having @Gmail001 through @Gmail100, with users frustrated wondering why they can't receive an email from their cousin who is on @Gmail088. We're both on Gmail, what gives

[–] SkepticElliptic 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your Twitter example is spot on. Why would I want to follow specific people? It's about the content on the platform. Tildes suffers from the same issue, it's generally not an interesting place to be so people don't stick around very long.

[–] zaver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Personally, I like to follow specific journalist and news orgs that report on topics I'm interested in. That def helps with the breaking news aspect. Besides following talented shitposters like dril ofc.

[–] AdminWorker@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I am brainstorming some features:

  • default normie instances that you don't have to choose from (auto choose all)
  • default migration between top normie servers (keep profile history and basically auto log into the next one if one is down)
  • community aggregation - if multiple communities are the same topic across different servers, auto aggregate posts and comment that are cross posted.
  • don't worry about it, if it has better content than Google and reddit, people will come.
[–] Thalestr 5 points 1 year ago

I think it's telling that people haven't really cared about the consolidation of the internet at all until recently when the likes of Reddit, Twitter, etc have started to falter and threaten the internet as they know it. They were fine with the status quo and don't know or want anything different. Not only do they not understand decentralisation - they wouldn't care or desire it anyway. You're absolutely right that things are going to have to be masked if we want to see increased adoption of alternative services. We also desperately need increased accessibility options and better instructions and education. Mastodon, Lemmy, Kbin, etc don't work like any other service that people commonly use. They have no idea how it functions or what to do, and it confuses them and turns them away.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly, I have an annoying tendency to ramble on about whatever cool thing is happening in the tech world and why I'm using X technology now but nobody cares about that

Managed to sell friends and family on Signal by just explaining it as "WhatsApp without the Facebook spying", think that's the way to do it

[–] alongwaysgone 2 points 1 year ago

I'll say that trying to use Lemmy on a browser was a lot more confusing than using liftoff or summit. I have..I think 4 or 5 accounts put into them and they all sorts of work together seamlessly. It's kinda cool and impressive. I forget which instance I'm signed into/posting as, which, IMHO is how it should be.

[–] alongwaysgone 1 points 1 year ago

Same. I probably still have a mastodon account.... Somewhere.

[–] TMoney 2 points 1 year ago

This was a great read. Thanks for sharing

[–] OneRedFox 2 points 1 year ago

Someone posted the arstechnica copy of this article the other day and I gave my thoughts on it.

load more comments (11 replies)