this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2244 readers
4 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apologies if this is the wrong community for this! Feel free to delete if it is.

Also, this is a big blow to lgbt anti discrimination but it also is a blow to a lot of others as well The way this decision is going to backfire and the fact it will be able to applied against not just lgbt people has not been thought through, at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cadeje 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Not only did this woman not make websites (and it was just a hypothetical essentially), apparently the person cited for wanting a website for his gay wedding is a straight, married man. So they just made up a nonexistent person for someone's nonexistent job and now there's a law about it.

[–] dcormier 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How did this pass muster as having standing?

[–] TechyDad 2 points 1 year ago

The same way that the Texas court found standing to ban the abortion drug because "the doctors suing might someday have a patient who took the drug and had a negative reaction requiring them to treat her."

They invent standing wherever it's required to get their agenda passed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)