this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10175 readers
7 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not in the US so can't participate, but I really love this, it's the only solution to the bipartisan conundrum. Although "Freedom" in the name triggered me lmao, I almost closed it thinking it was a MAGA thing before looking more closely.
Hah, I know! The biggest drawback is that Approval/Freedom Voting doesn't have a good name! I would have named it Binary Voting, since you can think of it as voting yes/no on every candidate, but even then I'm not sure how good a name that is.
But hell, if naming it 🦅Freedom Voting🦅 is what gets us voting reform? I'm all for it.
Personally, I don't think any voting system is enough to break the duopoly, you need to have multi-seat and/or proportional representation, but it's a good first step. Approval is great for single-winner elections and it's very easy to tweak for multi-winner and proportional elections, so it's a no-brainer when you're thinking multiple steps ahead.
I love calling it freedom voting because this means that we can claim that any opponents are against "freedom and voting."
Republicans have done this for decades using "freedom," "Patriotism," and other terms. They can try to pass a bill to allow straight white Christians to discriminate against anyone they want and will call it the "Increasing Freedom Bill." Then, they'll say that any Democrats voting against it obviously hate freedom.
Time to give them a little of their own medicine.