this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
87 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
69 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm just curious for the new or existing people? Lemmy.ml has taken a hard turn to the right since the reddit exodus. There's been a lot of pro-imperialist propaganda being posted on world news, and a lot less diversity of opinion. It feels more neoliberal and neo-con to me.

Does anyone want to share what their political leanings are?

I'll start; I'm anti-imperialist pro-state regulated capitalism. I believe we should have usage based taxes (toll roads, carbon tax) and luxury taxes, and I disagree with wealth taxes for people with less than $250 million. The state should spend more money on consumer protection in all industries (environment, health, finance, etc.) I believe in multipolarity vs. US hegemony.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What happened on lemmy.ml? That place is moderated by tankies with their finger on the ban trigger, so I am skeptical if you mean "hard turn to the right" or "normal people calling out the propaganda that my echo chamber used to shield me from."

To answer the question, I'm a radical anarchist, no state, no money, no bosses, no landlords, no compromises.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

World News is hosted on Lemmy.ml and since you use the term Tankie I suppose you're biased and may not see the shift in what articles are upvoted the most on that sub.

[–] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't read that place because it's full of tankies so I can't confirm or deny what you're suggesting. Do you mind sharing some of those right-wing articles?

(edit: and yes I am 100% unconditionally and unabashedly biased against authoritarians.)

[–] animist@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Count this anarchist as 100% biased

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

(Be kind, not trying to start a flame war) I keep seeing this thrown around, what is a β€œtankie” and what’s it got to do with that Lemmy instance?

[–] homeomorphism@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Tankie is a pejorative label for communists : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

depending on who youre talking to it either means all communist or specifically communists who unabashedly support authoritarian sociopathic governments

communists who unabashedly support authoritarian sociopathic governments tend to frame it as exclusively an insult for communists in general, either out of a refusal to recognise any other branch of communism as actually communist, to pull attention away from their support of authoritarian sociopathic governments or to frame whoever is calling them tankies as anti-communist, and probably a fascist

[–] NotSpez@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a Marxist-Leninist I am curious what your approach would be to military intervention as the US has done time and time again with leftist movements in the third-world. I think there are many valid critiques of the state but I see it as a necessary evil to protect a leftist movement.

I am open to opinions and genuinely curious to hear your perspective.

[–] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

For matters of defense against imperialism, the state is an orthogonal question. The state is just a monopoly on violence. A community can be just as prepared to defend themselves as a state (arguably more so, since every person can be their own guerilla, instead of a blessed few.)

Speaking of which, there have been many Marxist revolutionaries that came into power with only guerilla/irregular/asymmetric warfare, which stands in contrast to the vanguard party approach. One requires a state and the other doesn't.