this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
440 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37635 readers
52 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New evidence strongly suggests that OceanGate's submersible, which imploded and killed all passengers on its way to the Titanic wreck, was unfit for the journey. The CEO, Stockton Rush, bought discounted carbon fiber past its shelf life from Boeing, which experts say is a terrible choice for a deep-sea vessel. This likely played a role in the submersible's tragic demise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thing is, as James Cameron pointed out in his interviews, this is not a cutting-edge field. The science of submersibles is well explored and the technologies are mature. Engineers know exactly how to construct a safe submersible to go as deep as you want. There are companies like this that make and sell these submersibles.

This guy was not doing research or experimentation. He was trying to cut costs because he probably couldn't afford a proper submersible under his business model and still make a profit. The only reason for using unconventional materials - materials that are well known to be unsuitable for this purpose - was that he thought he could do it more cheaply if he didn't go through safety certification or buy a sub that had already been certified. The point was to spend less money by taking more risks and make a profit. He was not innovating, and he was arrogantly overconfident, to the point of overriding all the experts who had warned him this would get people killed.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

James Cameron pointed out

how did a filmmaker suddenly became expert in a field that is not filmmaking? if you want to make argument by authority, at least pick real authority ;)

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I thought that too at first, but he is actually an experienced diver who has repeatedly visited the bottom of the ocean, including a solo dive to the deepest point in the world. He does seem to know what he is talking about.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/120325-james-cameron-mariana-trench-challenger-deepest-returns-science-sub

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

interesting, i had no idea, i thought that his perceived expertise is devised from making titanic. thank you for the link.