this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
496 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
21 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] curiosityLynx@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would claim actual free speech absolutists don't exist.

[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're probably since those that preach about free speech are politically driven, hence biased to protect their stance. Rest of us have realized speech isn't free of consequence and the last third just doesn't give a fuck.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Defamation, fraud, hate speech, harassment, collusion, confidentiality, incitement...

No reasonable person actually thinks that free speech is an unlimited right. Plenty of kinds of speech are viewed as too harmful to be legal. The right is well understood to be about political speech only, and even then the edge cases can be hard to pin.

Anyone who claims to be an absolutist on free speech is insane or absolutely full of shit.

[–] 50gp@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

you forgot the most important one: being negative against musk/spez/freeSpeechAdmin123/insert any other free speech absolutist authority figure here

[–] Traumkaempfer@fedia.io 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn’t he also give in to block a few accounts of political opponents in Turkey instead of risking being banned there completely, because he said it would be better to lose a few accounts instead of losing the whole country?

[–] Cube6392 1 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, he's threatening to leave the EU. It's clear he actively gives authoritarian regimes preferential treatment and wants free regimes to give him special treatment under the guise that his personal mission is to save the world (much like the Vogons did in Hitchikers Guide (they're the slug creatures who bulldozed the earth)). He pretends it's all for progress. It's all for himself.