this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
75 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

220 readers
110 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada desperately needs a national strategic internet constellation.

Edit to fix link.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 23 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

We do not need a constellation. We do not need more space junk.

We need fibre everywhere.

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Eat your fibres, everyone.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Fibre is not going to get us up north.

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Maybe when we get 6g and our avian bird flu boosters we can get 6g access through our minds 🀯

/s due to it being utterly insane, but I recognize Poe's law is alive more than ever now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

Similar problems with fibre to all of Australia. It's just not feasible for small remote communities.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

There are solutions for the far arctic that aren't high density mesh networks polluting low earth orbit.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Yes there are such solutions, but for remote regions without infrastructure and with high build out and operating/maintenance costs for terrestrial technology, I suspect that the most cost effective solution that we can achieve in a timely fashion is probably LEO, like Lightspeed or Starlink. Particularly since Canada has half a century of experience building satellite systems.

Managing LEO debris and congestion is not an insurmountable challenge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

If we must have a satellite it should be a single geostationary one.