this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

Fairvote Canada

1 readers
3 users here now

What is This Group is About?/De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?

The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.

🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.

Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.

🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.


Related Communities/Communautés Associées

Resources/Ressources

Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles



We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.

Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Fair Vote Canada on Bluesky

Young voters are Canada’s electoral majority—so why do so many feel unheard?

A new Cord article explores the barriers to voting and how Fair Vote Canada is fighting for a system where every vote truly counts.

Read more: Creating a toolbox of voting resources - The Cord

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

MMP is an electoral system that satisfies the criteria of proportional representation, so the question doesn't quite make sense.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since they're different systems, I'm wondering which you prefer since pushing a general nebulous philosophy rarely works in a movement, it's best to get specific about what you want. Unless you're Trump.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Proportional representation (PR) is a characteristic of electoral systems, not an electoral system itself.

Mixed member proportional (MMP) and Single transferable vote (STV) are both examples of electoral systems that satisfy the criteria of PR.

My opinion is that STV is the superior of the two (because there is no formalization of political parties), but PR is so good, that any implementation of PR is sufficient.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks! My province, Alberta, apparently had STV back in ze day.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Yup, that's right, Alberta had PR in the early days.

I wrote a little bit about it in my comment why referendums for electoral reform are nonsense.