this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Politics

12 readers
6 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's suggestion of a Marmite sandwich and an apple for lunch wouldn't keep a child full or feed their brain sufficiently, according to local health and education experts.

"If you're just doing a Marmite sandwich and an apple, you're probably not meeting the protein requirements [which depend on age and gender]," paediatric dietician Jenny Douglas explained to RNZ.

"Ideally it would be a Marmite and cheese sandwich at least," she said, noting that the high salt content of Marmite, which could shape one's palate, giving a child a taste for salty snacks like pies and chips early on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] liv@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if your kids are trading or something?

I grew up in an era where most of us had two sandwiches and if ever I got anything too exotic for my tastes (like, luncheon sausage) I would try to exchange it for a marmite or a peanut butter.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't remember what age I started not taking lunch to school, but it was before high school. Before that, yeah, two sandwiches. I never got little packets of chips or things like that as a kid, not sure when that got more common.

I wonder if your kids are trading or something?

For sure. I see empty chip packets come home in their lunch boxes that I never put there. Sometimes a muesli bar wrapper or roll up wrapper. Not sure what they are trading, fruit and sandwiches doesn't seem exciting enough to entice the other kid,

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Idk, anything for novelty? If another kid gets chips or roll ups a lot they might want a marmite sandwich?

Yeah chips weren't the norm at my primary either. Sandwiches, fruit, those mini packets of cinderella raisins. The technology of lunch has moved at a clipping pace by the sounds of some of the recipes in here.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Idk, anything for novelty? If another kid gets chips or roll ups a lot they might want a marmite sandwich?

Yeah true. I refuse to buy those little bags of chips that contain more plastic bag mass than chips.

those mini packets of cinderella raisins

Ooh I forgot about those! The dentist told me not to give the kids dried fruit haha.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Microplastic and saturated fats, lunch of champions. /s

I guess dried fruit is way more sugary than fruit fruit?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The explanation was that yes dried fruit (all fruit) has a lot of sugar, and dried fruit in particular sticks to your teeth. They said adults tend to pick at this with their tongue and clean it off their teeth but kids don't and it just sits there.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense. I would think that would exclude those sticky roll up things too.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 14 hours ago

Yeah I presume so. My kids aren't a fan of them anyway. I think they aren't as sugary as they used to be.