this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
34 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

64 readers
6 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mtpender@aussie.zone 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'll be voting all minor parties across the board with the major parties right at the bottom. If the major parties want people to vote for them, they should try listening to the people and fixing the housing crisis and cost-of-living crisis.

Remove negative gearing, remove capital gains tax concessions, implement net-zero immigration, outlaw AirBnB, make foreign investment into residential property illegal, introduce a vacancy tax, punish developers who conduct "land-banking" and invest in TAFE to train the people we need locally.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

This is pretty radical economic policy.

Is there any research supporting all of this or just the vibe?

Labor ran on negative gearing reform and we got morisson.

So you'll put Labor below One Nation?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You no longer have to vote for the majors at all. We can now withhold votes completely.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is a terrible idea. You just threw your vote away, That is how the really bad guys get in.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Exaclty. They have a dumbarse first past the post system where you either vote for a shit party or throw your vote away. So people throw their vote away if they are disillusioned with the shit two party system.

We have an S tier electoral system where you can rank your preferences and make politicians aware that people are voting for particular issues and still make sure your vote goes to the least bad major. We don't want the sort of ignorance they have in the US where nobody gives a shit then they act all surprised. Fuck that. As major parties go the ALP is ok. They won't be my first choice but I am not leaving a vote that impacts my family to a bunch of News Corp readers.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’m voting Greens and any leftist minor party.

I’m not voting Lib, Lab, or any other rightist party.

As major parties go, Lab are only okay compared to Lib. They’re thoroughly shit when compared to our better options.

At no point is my vote thrown away.

[–] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

If you don't fill in all the boxes for the House of Representatives ballot paper, you've voted informally and wasted your vote.

If you let your vote exhaust for the Senate ballot paper, you signal that you don't have an opinion on who should get elected once your selected candidates have been eliminated, which basically amounts to throwing your vote away if your preferences haven't already contributed to electing someone.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's a wasted vote, and not an option in the federal elections. It's just as important to keep the extreme right-wing Liberal and National parties from power, as it is to preference the better minor parties (make sure to investigate as some minors and independents are extreme right-wing nutbags).

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s important to keep all right wing parties from power Lib or Lab.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The ordering of how right wing they are matters. That's the whole point of preferential voting.

If you abstain from ranking all candidates, you are acting the same as US voters claiming that "both sides are the same" and then not voting, particularly if your preferred minor candidate(s) don't have a chance of winning in your electorate.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And this is exactly why America ended up with Trump, people always wanting to support the lesser of two evils.

Don’t do what Americans do. Don’t blindly support a shit right wing party because you’re scared of a shit right wing party and let the whole country collapse after decades of right wing rule.

If Lab want my vote back, they can earn it instead of sliding further right every year.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

Yes, and abstaining only gives them a larger proportion of the votes.

Find the left wing candidates (the senate has some even if your local ballot doesn't) and preference them, if you want to help keep out Lib and Lab.

[–] NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 14 points 3 days ago

exhausting your vote might be bad depending on your seat.

Also be careful with some minors. There are a lot that are essentially just the LNP or worse.

[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In some states, but not in federal elections (in House of Reps).