this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

219 readers
76 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
84
Opinion: The U.S. actually has a huge trade surplus in services – that’s where Canada should hit (www.theglobeandmail.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What ultimately influenced U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision last week to delay the tariffs he planned to impose on Canadian imports was arguably Canada’s announcement of targeted retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, strategically designed to affect Republican-leaning states the most. But the measures that may be enough to make Mr. Trump pause may not be enough to make him back off permanently.

. . .

Consequently, unless retaliatory measures pose a significant economic threat to the United States, Mr. Trump is likely to proceed with imposing tariffs on trading partners with which the country has large trade deficits, such as China (US$350-billion), Mexico (US$130.6-billion), Canada (US$100-billion) and the European Union (US$200-billion).

The key challenge for Canada – and other U.S. trading partners – is clear: to design a package of retaliatory tariffs and countermeasures that maximally affect U.S. economic interests. One effective strategy to do so is targeting the U.S.’s massive and rapidly growing service trade surplus.

Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’d like to add something here: any retaliatory action has to be something that will be felt by the US population during the next four years. Because Trump really doesn’t care beyond that.

Retaliation that will be felt slowly, peaking in 5 or 6 years? That’s the Republican dream, as it will keep them in power and make Canada the enemy.

[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm of the opinion nearly the opposite. Frankly speaking, he doesn't care how much the people suffer. Half the population could starve to death and he'd just shrug and say "skill issue".

I do agree that what we do needs to hurt quickly, but the target are the oligarchs that Trump listens to, not the common people. I mean, unless if you're trying to incite a civil war over there, but Jan6 couldn't even be considered anything close to such a thing, and I doubt they'll reach that point in 4 years no matter how badly they run things into the ground short of publicly executing entire protest marches.