this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10257 readers
28 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The fact that anyone is going along with this is absurd. These people are not actually a part of the government, so these requests should just be refused outright. They have not been hired, elected, appointed, or vetted.
The White House has said Musk and his DOGE colleagues are "special government employees." It has yet to be seen of that arrangement is legal, but as it stands, they are part of the government workforce which is why bureaucrats are "going along with this".
White House casually admiting they created a new department without congressional approval and oversight, violating Article II.
Special government employeeis a specific classification that has been used by both Parties to have an advisor in the Executive Branch for brief periods (120 days at most).That does not imply that DOGE is an official agency or department.
They are legally distinct concepts
And do `special government employees' run the department of USAID?