this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
119 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37920 readers
55 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This will not work. It sounds great, it sounds plausible, even realistic at some level, but this will not work.
Here's why.
The bot operator has more money than you do. If the efficiency of one bot decreases on one website, they'll throw another bot at it, rinse and repeat until your website stops responding because it's ground to dust.
Meta bots are good at doing this, hitting your site with thousands of requests a second, over and over again.
Meta is not alone in this, but in my experience it's the most destructive.
Source: One of my clients runs a retail website and I've been dealing with this.
At the moment the "best" - least worse is probably more accurate - "solution" is to block them as if they're malicious traffic - which essentially is what they are.
I think part of this software at least in the description on the website is easy and reliable detection of LLM bots to block. You can run it and it will generate statistics about bots that get caught in it so you can easily block big lists of them.