this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
154 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37875 readers
58 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BREAKING - Tiktok has now SHUT DOWN SERVICES in the United States, noting "A law banning Tiktok has been enacted in the U.S. Unfortunately, that means you can't use TikTok for now. We are fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he will work with us on a solution to reinstate Tiktok once he takes office. Please stay tuned!"

@technology@beehaw.org @news@beehaw.org @usnews@beehaw.org @programming@beehaw.org @technology@lemmy.world @news@lemmy.world #technology @worldnews@lemmy.ml @technology@lemmy.ml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Have you read the study?

Because: I still only get the names of the authors when I click the link to the study. In the article on the other hand there is a link to the “study that will be published” and it goes to the same rather blank archive url that you provided.

If the study has already been published, maybe you got another source?

Edit:

I managed to get it:

https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/Peer-Reviewed-Paper-in-Press_Dec.-2024.pdf

But yeah, I won’t read it now, cause it’s massive. That’s also why I replied to your quotes in the first place.

Also, I think we know each other from some time ago, right?