this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
1455 readers
36 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If it is new malware, scanners wouldnt pick up on it.
On behavior tab there is tons of stuff. Shouldnt there be none? I dont know too much about virustotals results mean, but doesnt the mitre thing mean it could potentially do something like that?
Actually they do often pick up on it, unless it is a very novel attack vector (and probably not something you'd find on a pirate site). Malware often follows very predictable code execution patterns of communicating with outside IP'S and modifying other executables, and these are things that can be detected by most AV.
There will never be none. it's all listed as low or no risk/informational only anyway, which goes back to the pattern recognition thing.
VT is listing things that the file has done during viewing. ALL things. This stuff might or might not be a concern, whether or not it's a known attack or pattern of malicious behavior. If you are a legit security analyst you can use the behavior data to see what files its touching and stuff and understand good and bad security design. Like, the only actual yellow warning is... it apparently looked at Google dns. Which is something any browser pdf viewer will do.
Oh. The other thing I forgot to mention, is every submission to Z-Lib goes through an approval process where a certain number of community contributors have to review the document and make sure it's legible, safe, and valid. I know, because I've submitted stuff before, it takes quite a few days to go live. It's not just random bad actors shotgunning stuff onto the site.
thank you, that puts my mind at ease somewhat