this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
95 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
65 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Congratulations. Reading this far into the story is a feat not many will accomplish, especially if shared on Facebook, according to a team led by Penn State researchers.

In an analysis of more than 35 million public posts containing links that were shared extensively on the social media platform between 2017 and 2020, the researchers found that around 75% of the shares were made without the posters clicking the link first. Of these, political content from both ends of the spectrum was shared without clicking more often than politically neutral content.

The findings, which the researchers said suggest that social media users tend to merely read headlines and blurbs rather than fully engage with core content, were published today (Nov. 19) in Nature Human Behavior. While the data were limited to Facebook, the researchers said the findings could likely map to other social media platforms and help explain why misinformation can spread so quickly online.

"It was a big surprise to find out that more than 75% of the time, the links shared on Facebook were shared without the user clicking through first," said corresponding author S. Shyam Sundar, Evan Pugh University Professor and the James P. Jimirro Professor of Media Effects at Penn State.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Unfortunately, Sci-Hub doesn't have the requested document:
10.1038/s41562-024-02067-4

Rats! Anybody got a pdf?

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wasn't sure how to lazily and semi securely send you a pdf, so check your DMs

Wish it were possible to safely share this stuff more widely, but in the meantime, internet nerds gotta help each other out

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sci-hub is frozen in about 2021 due to a court case or something, as far as I remember, so new papers won't be on there

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

Ahhh, thank you.