this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37734 readers
36 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think this would be a step in the right direction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I guess you could keep Chrome as it is running in another company... But Chrome is Google-service-clogged Chromium, still making money for Google and changing literally nothing in terms of monopolistic behavior by Google. I don't see the benefit in this division.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'd imagine if Chrome was split, all the integrations would either have to be opened to other companies, imagine "log in to Chrome with your Microsoft account", or would have to go away.

At least Google wouldn't be able to treat web standards as their own playground any more, so other browsers could compete better.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Or... "Chrome company" could strike a deal with Google and keep an exclusive integration with Chrome, in exchange of all of users metadata. Capitalis*m.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 hours ago

I don't doubt something shitty is going to happen, but that would still be better, since Google would have to pay for fucking up the internet instead of doing it for free like now. And on the other hand, wouldn't Google have to pay more than its competition combined for exclusivity?

Imagine Google pays Chrome 1 million schmeckles for exclusivity, if Microsoft and Amazon would show up saying they would also pay 1-1 million just for access, then Google would realistically need to pay at least 2 million for it to still make sense for Chrome. Something that used to be free for Google now is something that they need to outbid their whole competition for.