Politics

10175 readers

10 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Speaker Johnson announces policy barring trans women from Capitol bathrooms (thehill.com)

submitted 4 days ago by UrLogicFails to c/politics

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive.today link

Some key excerpts:

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) announced Wednesday that transgender women are not permitted to use bathrooms in the Capitol that match their gender identity

The policy [...] will also apply to bathrooms in House office buildings, changing rooms and locker rooms.

Johnson’s statement — which was made on Transgender Day of Remembrance, recognized annually to memorialize trans people who died due to anti-trans violence — comes days after Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) introduced a bill to bar transgender women from facilities on Capitol Hill that match their gender identity, a response to the election earlier this month of Rep.-elect Sarah McBride (D-Del.).

McBride blasted Mace’s legislation earlier this week, calling it “a blatant attempt from far right-wing extremists to distract from the fact that they have no real solutions to what Americans are facing.”

Mace was threatening to force a vote on the matter prior to Johnson’s decision to formally announce the new policy; the congresswoman wanted the terms to be included in the rules package for the 119th Congress and said she would force a vote on the bill if that did not come to fruition.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UrLogicFails 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I don't think the Old Testament is particularly anti-trans either. Most Republicans use the Bible as a way to launder their own hateful views, but I doubt if they're even remotely religious at all.

[–] remington 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don’t think the Old Testament is particularly anti-trans either.

Nowhere in the Bible is sexuality (as we now it today) nor gender, etc addressed. I know this because I've been reading biblical scholarship for over thirty years. I am, also, the founder of Reddit's AskBibleScholars.

Please, think about this carefully. It would be like asking what the Bible thinks of Philips-head screwdrivers.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but my question is a little more specific:

What does the Bible say about me using torx bits that aren't impact-rated on my impact driver if I use a torque limiting bar?

[–] remington 10 points 4 days ago