this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
52 points (100.0% liked)
And Finally...
21 readers
14 users here now
A place for odd or quirky world news stories.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse:
- !weirdnews@real.lemmy.fan
- !offbeat@lemmy.ca
- !nottheonion@lemmy.world
- !nottheonion@lemmy.ml
- !nottheonion@zerobytes.monster
- !aiop@lemmy.world
- !jingszo@lemmy.world
- !forteana@feddit.uk
- !strangetimes@lemmy.world
- !goodnews@feddit.uk
- !upliftingnews@lemmy.world
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other
- The Internet will resurface old "And finally..." material. Just mark it [VINTAGE]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lol, if only there was some way we could have some kind of agreement with close trading partners to not require customs checks.
some sort of union perhaps...
one that perhaps spans the continant of europe...
i wonder what we'd call it
While correct and leaving was stupid.
This is a worldwide competition. And as such has procedures to allow entry from non EU nations.
So it really is the one place where Brexit stupidity should not have left the UK at a disadvantage.
Clearly something went wrong. And if the articles claim that the UK was trying to communicate with EU customs and identify that fault is correct. And no other nation fell into this issue.
It seems like this may not be a one-off issue. But instead, something that increases the burden to UK traders beyond even our own stupidity. To the point where we can't even compete with other non EU nations within the EU.
Yea but that's not the reality of today, alas.
What is plain is that the EU customs and border officials failed to do their job properly. For a bloc that goes on and on about "the rule of law" they sure do know when to apply the rule of law.
Yes, because uk border checks have all been perfect. No delays, no wasted goods, no skipping checks.
This article isn't about UK border checks. Why are you bringing up whataboutism arguments?
Because you implied they were being selective in enforcement. So, comparison is applicable.
It's the article that my quote is from in the original reply. Not sure you've read it 🤔? Those are the facts from the linked story.
Where have you plucked this "selective enforcement" nonsense from?
No! We need to form closer trade deals with a continent on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean. So that instead of driving, we can fly or use a ship. Allowing for the weather of course.