this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
64 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SweetCitrusBuzz 19 points 1 week ago (25 children)

Destroy the cars. That's what should be done about it.

[–] Vodulas 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'm all for mass transit, but there are some jobs that require cars. My partner does home health, for example. She often has to take a lot of bulky durable medical equipment (DME) to a person's home. Even if mass transit existed in all of her territory, transporting DME on it would be prohibative, especially when there are often multiple people that need different pieces of equipment.

[–] DdCno1 28 points 1 week ago

This is precisely the kind of niche, but vital use case that even places that have otherwise already completely banned cars (like certain islands) allow cars for. Nobody will ever take this away.

[–] lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 week ago

That's a good point to illustrate the importance of banning cars for personal transportation; all of the traffic is making your partner's job slower and more stressful

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I meant the self driving ones. Apologies for not clarifying.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Humans are not getting any better at driving. Self-driving cars will eventually lead to tens of thousands of human lifes saved annually. Why do you want to prevent this?

[–] BurningRiver 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

will eventually

You’re looking for “may eventually”. We’re not anywhere near this so using it as a current argument is rather silly.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Waymo gives 100,000+ rides a week and has never killed anyone, to my knowledge. Seems like it might already be safer than a human driver, it must have millions of miles driven.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Will it? All I have seen is that self driving cars will decide to kill people because they cannot make decisions about life in a way that preserves it.

Maybe in like 1000 years plus they might become good enough but by that time the conditions that make cars a necessity would be no more or at least severly reduced.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All I have seen is that self driving cars will decide to kill people because they cannot make decisions about life in a way that preserves it.

Do you have any examples?

[–] parlaptie@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Watch the video, my dude.

[–] wraithcoop@lemmy.one 2 points 1 week ago

watch the video, my dude

[–] Vodulas 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, got it. Could also be my migraine making me not fully get things.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz 2 points 1 week ago

No worries! Hope you feel better soon!

load more comments (21 replies)