In my first reply I already told you it was Russian propaganda, in addition to 4 other countries'. Nobody told you not to read the website, I told you to respond to the content of the actual article if you want to pretend to actually reply, not dick around exploring every link you find.

She is the ONLY SOURCE? Do you think that a member of Ukrainian parliament is going to get away with lying about what the military is saying? The lack of context exists only because of your lack of investigation into the subject.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thanks for the additional context.

The additional context: "yes, I posted a propaganda article, but your investigation of the source and the source of the source wasn't enough. You need to investigate more but I won't provide any links or other sources."

[–] multi_regime_enjoyer@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're literally demanding spoon feeding 😭 go copy and paste the name of the member of parliament and key words from the statement into your desired search engine you intransigent fraudster

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would be the "Source of the source"

[–] multi_regime_enjoyer@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

What are you going to do when you find out it's real and quite obvious at that?

[–] multi_regime_enjoyer@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I ONLY POST PROPAGANDA ARTICLES! News IS propaganda! 📢📢📢