this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
385 points (100.0% liked)

196

667 readers
105 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cat_in_socks@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe he should've helped design a political system that doesn't inevitably lead to a two party system.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Of all of his failings, I don't think you can really blame that one on him. His time had to balance an alliance of states that had really wanted to be a confederacy with reestablishing (small r) republicanism for the first meaningful time beyond the city-state level in two thousand years.

There's going to be some misses.

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does the small r go on reestablishing or republican 🤔

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

It's a small r because they didn't want to share freedom with the hard r

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, but who should we blame then? Our two headed oligarchy is nearly the worst possible attempt at a democracy amongst the developed world and yet it was designed to be as difficult as possible to improve or replace.

Of all the problems the US has, our lack of a functioning democracy is by the most frustrating.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Time itself and modern fascism?

It's not super surprising that the first modern attempt at federal democracy would have some bad takes, but no system can function when half of the people in it are bad faith actors.