this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
791 points (100.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

109 readers
18 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been told that this is a no-go for city planners because the sheer quantity of fallen fruit can be a walking hazard, and no one wants the legal liability. What it comes down to is that "free" fruit trees would require additional ongoing maintenance costs. Nothing nefarious, just logistical issues.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

what if the trees are planted in a park, far from the road?

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How fucked is it that our first thoughts are about cars and sidewalks?

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cars, yeah it's fucked. But I think keeping things walkable is good.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No doubt, but look at the black and white thinking in this thread. We can't have fruit trees at all because they might interfere with sidewalks, or because city planners might get in a huff.

I'm not discounting the legitimate concerns of trafficability or zoning, but to write it off completely for these concerns is trash. If we can engineer a tailings dam and plan for 100 year floods that might ruin it, then we can figure out a way to permit fruit bearing trees in cities.

[–] NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 1 points 1 month ago

I think people are thinking more that if you want to feed people just give them food you buy is more cost effective.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because fruit on a grass field isn't a hazard? Also who said anything about cars? Cyclists use the road too and it's a much larger hazard for them than for cars. You're the one thinking about cars here, not me.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

You're coming on pretty strong and I haven't even had my coffee.

There are other comments about the topics I am getting at. I'm not attacking you but agreeing with you.

Chill bruh.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

I'd say that's a question for city planners.