this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
324 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

235 readers
55 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can't predict the next click, that's what random means. This would never have gotten far enough to appear in front of an audience. They would have tried it at rehearsal and realised it was impossible.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It does have a rate though. Each click is random, but overall they're at a predictable rate. Still, it wouldn't be useful for music really. I could see someone trying to make it happen though. I've heard of dumber things.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Well in that case all you've done is reinvent tempo but worse. Unless you vary the rate on the fly, which requires moving the counter and/or radioactive material on the fly. And then all you've done is create a very bad musical instrument.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

It would be Musical Roulette essentially

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

The Geiger counter can be pre recorded, creating the illusion it was life, yet allowing the composition to be crafted around it