this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
149 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

219 readers
155 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] piccolo@ani.social 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah... no. Perhaps opt out by default, but not compulsory.

[–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why not? Why do you need the ability to deprive someone of a live saving procedure after you literally died?

[–] piccolo@ani.social 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I dont know. Probably because it risks being abused. The US already has private prisons filled to the brim with trivial felons forced to work in sweat shops... im sure theyll love to sell their organs too after dying from heat stroke.

[–] QuizzaciousOtter@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I see, that's a valid concern. I wonder whether we could try to prevent such abuse by automatically excluding more prone groups like prisoners. It really seems crazy to me how many organs, which could literally save someone's life, are going to waste.

[–] piccolo@ani.social 5 points 5 months ago

I think opt out would be sufficient. Right now, its a compilcated to opt in and not many people thinks about it. In my state, the only time you see it, is a small checkbox when you get a drivers license.

But being opt out everyone is included unless they choose not to, for whatever reason. Which is think is more than fair. Its their body, they should have the right to do whatever they wish, regardless if they arent using it anymore. The amount of people opting out would be a minority, so it shouldn't really be a concern.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean opt in by default?

[–] piccolo@ani.social 7 points 5 months ago

No, the current system is opt in. You have to choose to be a donor. Opt out means you have to choose not to be.