this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
492 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
16 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RosalynKirk@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

What's to stop Revolt from becoming the next Discord?

Edit: I just logged into my account to see that Revolt had removed a "server" for breaking foreign (unjust) laws. That seems to go against everything the fediverse stands for.

[–] ragemidi@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@RosalynKirk

1.) because Revolt isn't trying to do federation. It's community driven open-source project not backed by a company.

2.) you can easily self-host a Revolt server. Then you can make your own rules.

Not everything has to be federated

[–] RosalynKirk@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

...is Discord trying to do federation? I'm confused.

Someone is in charge of Revolt, doesn't matter if it's a company or someone else. Someone is in charge of the servers. What's stopping them from ultimately selling the company? Reddit didn't start out as a corporation. Nor did WhatsApp, but after creating a trusted userbase they were sold off to Facebook to be exploited for data.

IT people love to talk about how "easy" it is to create and run your own server, but this is simply not true and they just lack awareness.

[–] Kaldo 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How can revolt "remove" a server since you can connect to any custom hosted server? It's like saying lemmy removed an instance.

And besides, I'm pretty sure that is something that federated instances will have to worry about too, you might not care about your local laws but the ISP or hosting provider of your server where possibly illegal data is, will care.

[–] RosalynKirk@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it isn't. The default is to be hosted on Revolt servers. I created a "server" and I didn't set up any kind of server, so it's not running on my server. I don't really know all the technical details, I just signed in and saw a message that said the "server" was removed.

[–] Kaldo 1 points 1 year ago

Ah I see, so kinda like having a community on kbin.social removed. I mean that makes sense then, the admin and owner of the server can decide if he doesn't want something there, its his server (or in this case, revolts)

[–] FixedFun@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

If this is an isolated issue I don't mind.