this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
97 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

149 readers
26 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
97
Climate expert says 2/3rds of humans are under an effective 'death sentence' (www.themirror.com)
submitted 2 months ago by gytrash@feddit.uk to c/climate@slrpnk.net
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"What everyone is missing about climate change is that it's not about saving the planet or about science: it's about people. Earth will survive – it'll be different, but it will carry on. Humans are the ones at risk."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FrenziedFelidFanatic@yiffit.net 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Humans are a cancer…” is a statement of fact. It is the solution that determines if someone is an ecofascist:

… so we should kill off humans and cure the world

is an ecofascist statement and is a problem.

… and we are going to kill our host

is still in the declarative form. Is is apparently defeatist/fatalist and may or may not be a problem depending on the other views of the person

… so we should stop being cancerous.

is more optimistic of human determinism. I think it is the most hopeful and helpful to our situation, but it is not inherently good, and not coming to this conclusion is not inherently bad.

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A cancer can't just stop being cancerous. Calling humans a cancer inherently implies that they should be exterminated, saying "humans are a cancer so maybe they should stop doing cancer stuff" is just incoherent.

Humans aren't a cancer and saying that is ecofascist bullshit. Capitalism is a cancer and it should be exterminated.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Preach, comrade!

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

So cancerous of you

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

♋ 🦀🦀